A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Why Care about Performance?

What is it about performance that makes people change their actions, thoughts, and beliefs? Is it merely a lifelong effect of peer pressure and family “training”? In small business performance traditionally translates directly into revenue because of inherent pressure to balance cash flow in the daily operation. The mind set of linking business performance to such a narrow set of variables will end up costing far more in the long run.

Measuring business performance is no gamePerformance as a system

Converting measurement of performance to a system approach is the ideal method because results can cover output from a larger pool of indicators than those that focus on revenue. Human capital, vendor management, supply chain, finance, and operations all have very important roles in determining performance values. Basically, a  holistic method rather than a reflexive one.

Reflexive Action

Reflexive action is a direct response to a particular stimulus or a set of stimuli without thinking. For example, sales revenue can be construed as a direct response to marketing effort and measured only as return on investment (ROI). A no-brainer, right? Wrong!  What about other influences like market conditions, employee effort, operational change, residual advertising, and risk?  In actuality, sales is a byproduct of a system working towards effectiveness and not a true measure of efficiency. Measuring the wrong system output leads to artificial or unrealistic performance.

Let’s see this in action. A print shop creates a flyer at a cost of $1,000 evangelizing the features and functions of their new printing service and sends it to 5,000 e-mail addresses on Monday. Tuesday, one of their top sales people closes three accounts leading to $10,000 in new billed revenue on the service. Wednesday, the head of operations decreases the cost of production by 10% by finding a cheaper source for paper and toner. Finally, Friday rolls in and an existing client buys the service from their account rep. How much of this week’s revenue can be attributed to the flyer? Based on measurement of new services acquired, the flyer is a huge success. Actually it is not. All the revenue produced comes from outbound efforts, optimization, or existing relationships; not the marketing campaign.

Holistic measurement

To correct this issue, a paradigm shift to a holistic approach is necessary. The flyer should be part of a system approach or plan to push printing services. All aspects of the business contribute to the program and should be measured. Looking at the whole company’s influence rather than just the flyer ROI will create better measurement. Knowing this, how can the flyer be adjusted for success? The best way to measure a marketing tactic like the flyer would be to include a QR code, measureable call to action, coupon, or contact method. Measuring performance would come from direct results of the campaign in the form of click through, inbound calls, redemption of coupons etc.

But ROI is the best measurement

At face value, Return on investment(ROI) is an easy method to use because it can be applied to just about any system. Simply dividing results by associated costs yields a percentage. The key is defining all the working components that go into the equation. In the case of the flyer, if you use sales produced during a specific time period and don’t account for other efforts the percentage will be artificially high. In essence, what goes in affects what comes out. The best practice would include detailing all components, creating measureable indicators, and defining realistic goals creating a process approach rather than just a tactic.

Intellectual Property Lawsuits, Becoming a Thing of the Past?

Tucked away in a side bar of the latest issue of Bloomberg Businessweek (December 18-22) is a quick summary of the H.R 3309 Innovation Act penned by Joshua Brustein. It documents the damage done by “patent assertion entities” and hopefully a bill to curb their actions. These companies build their business on threatening legal action for patent infringement knowing most companies will simply settle rather than fight a costlyCost of Intellectual Property litigation. The fact that such companies exist demonstrates the need and value of a clear intellectual property plan. Even small businesses need to protect their assets to retain and build sustainable value.

Defining intellectual property

Everyone has heard about copyright, trademarks, and patents but may not truly understand the difference. At a high level, copyright focuses on the action of distribution of a particular asset for a specified length of time. Trademarking defines a particular entity through the use of “marks” that distinguish it as a singular source. Finally, patents protect inventions so they may be disclosed to the public. In each case tangible assets are created and as such, have value. But why bother with this process if litigation and the process itself are so expensive and difficult to defend? The answer lies in taking advantage of the product life cycle.

Patent Basics

Procuring a patent generally falls under either a utility or design process. In each case, temporary protection is given during the review process. This allows businesses to benefit from the protection during the rigorous evaluation process. The critical data to remember is any patentable invention must not have been known or used by others in this country; been previously patented or described in print; or been sold or used publicly within the last year. Any violation of these rules denies right to patent. Additionally the invention must be tangible and not simply an idea. Usually an actual prototype or detailed description of a working model is necessary. As a best practice, don’t forget to use non-disclosure agreements for all interested parties who review the invention.

Struggling with IP

Unfortunately patents are viewed as a “big business” attribute and not for small businesses because of cost, limited resources, and return on investment. This is wrong! It is true significant investment is necessary to build out an intellectual property portfolio but can become extremely valuable when a small business matures and looks for expansion capital. Cost of a basic copyright starts at $35, trademarks – $275, and provisional utility patents – $1,000+. Patents are more expensive because of the search process and should be filed with a patent attorney or qualified representative. Business owners have to assess the value of their ideas and resources to defend against infringement. As mentioned early in this post the defense costs can outweigh benefits of obtaining protection. As a best practice, business owners should review options by conducting a feasibility analysis prior to execution. Feel free to contact me if you need assistance.

Return to Top...